- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
發表於 2025-1-4 03:27:02
|
顯示全部樓層
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old3 _$ l+ b/ W8 b* b3 s- \! u* m
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical: J, h5 d9 f" S* O0 p) W8 [
Exposure to Testosterone
# c( l4 v% O3 Q; g+ p/ w1 X) O3 uSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,28 o! k# b/ s p& t
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
- n- B' o, i) s7 G: RClinical Pediatrics+ u2 s. q f7 B! f3 c/ `
Volume 46 Number 6
% h- Y$ P8 k7 z& H: [! a6 OJuly 2007 540-543
& u/ E6 l( M2 L! y) T© 2007 Sage Publications
$ Y) J: }! X$ C" ]* y3 ]& W10.1177/0009922806296651! K6 S1 f& ^8 L
http://clp.sagepub.com
; ^" @# M) ~% P5 c- b& w6 Dhosted at5 B, K$ v. v1 w2 X9 ~6 _: ?
http://online.sagepub.com
9 o N$ g: P* Q! Q X N+ x: |& `Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,0 M, E7 e* |9 [/ Q5 v* \
is a significant concern for physicians. Central+ x- d, R9 N4 b
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated6 f$ D& G' U; s: ]- S
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has5 h. ~: M/ D i1 [4 d8 U4 v4 w& d
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system: |) w" G- N" e$ g$ S8 ]; c
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
3 T0 ~1 ~/ `- u) mby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic8 [& Y* G. q# T& W; ~# f( c% ]
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
' g' ~5 J& E, O7 D$ Gcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
& K/ ~$ n" L( _2 \# @. L$ N. S2 Jreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
% K7 s5 E" E" j Cenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
3 t! A1 ]0 o5 v5 Pment without testicular enlargement, which was due+ N9 p0 x* [9 N) b5 B" z5 s2 g
to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
& K4 p5 S" O3 }: z- O! Y* ~the father. The family initially concealed this infor-' a! i! y+ v0 B+ ?9 D
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
! |+ Y3 G. k7 a5 Fchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
. z- G9 v$ ~9 t+ btestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-! [2 Z; y3 G! a" e3 }
bly more common than the rare case report in the
6 g5 P! d5 ?/ e, tliterature.4$ i! Q( s4 H$ [9 o+ L- _: X
Patient Report* F4 _8 f% l" L. R' i3 m( m
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the7 b1 Y1 Q+ E n" z
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
; W, @2 o/ c0 M/ b0 aof early sexual development. His mother noticed x: ^: n* T2 d. h5 }
light colored pubic hair development when he was3 t0 j! Z* r0 ~5 j3 r6 U9 L( I7 q
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of9 P/ v) G9 V% K2 w r1 z6 i
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
; Q2 L; M3 n# ^) B9 J* ~Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
; }+ k# U$ l/ _" SProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
+ [4 r3 i1 U5 m% YMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
/ u' m' _1 p* U( ~" le-mail: [email protected].
3 Q" w# Q' U) I. n& L. N1 y* g- c7 `about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
$ Z' W/ t7 R2 X4 r" z9 A! Qdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-* @. f. e0 D& A- p( `
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child& K% I) y* D+ m' D) S: v
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
/ d y( W. F/ R& T# T; W3 p: Z: O Ja birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of; Q/ S/ Z4 x/ U: D5 d% E, Y. M
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year& \) c% a! O$ I) u
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
/ |# S7 |4 K# ~6 ^ `4 B3 s3 T/ ksolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,8 s& y9 q% {/ m$ l8 F
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
2 `/ E- e) Z) f9 L' O \: e$ {was age appropriate.
* E/ W1 s" v; b* p1 Z! a+ ^( mThe family history was remarkable for the father,/ K4 [+ O- z- s* ]
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,; N0 K i3 c5 {! _; g$ w0 R
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s u1 H2 J( F2 T, H
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
+ a i' h) R, ^" [' \" y; Bearly puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
1 b( [; V0 c( O( J6 iThe father denied taking any other medication. The( M ~4 u% Q* P" P) E$ {
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche" I. i& ~( C$ d \# c7 l% a1 ~
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet7 j0 R# \/ X1 H/ C# [" p
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
, I$ a7 h3 _; d0 Q( f& Acocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
1 E! g- U& H3 M) x) t f0 v/ Ktives. There were no siblings.6 I. h K& B" Z& n( T9 c+ B
Physical Examination
4 n- ]; g# j# y* B& CThe physical examination revealed a very active,$ Y' i# C2 _ k
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
; N W1 T# K6 g5 @4 c9 N2 da blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
! r& m- e+ Z# [. ~/ d90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
, E) W; Q% ?4 H% X(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
9 z, I2 a0 L: r+ g! Pvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of+ X5 U4 Y; i+ V( x0 Q3 \5 C4 a8 I
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
6 L; L, F, L0 q& c! {2 y# r: lThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for; @5 R5 \$ j5 S4 Q6 b- P9 M
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of, w* z# ~. y5 t' {$ ^$ {
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well9 o9 A( L# ~3 _4 u; Z8 w. F
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
2 ?% k% Q* [" ^8 _540
9 {' p$ O7 d: C- i X+ ^2 o7 [at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
! V* ^& K/ c" [- t |! R# V3 Dthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
: F3 u9 }: R/ J" j; \, Utesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.$ l- _7 z# Z2 X
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat* `% A( Y3 P9 k" o/ l( ?
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no' |% y$ o) g9 X
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
; P; t0 K; I. Q UNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
' c% m' X0 D! ]3 D* n/ ybilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion: \9 m6 V6 S4 t" o0 g, Q* p N
of papilledema.
6 b( k4 P# ^3 W1 n7 z0 {/ T6 }Laboratory Evaluation
; n- E! Y: ]6 f$ ^4 m2 U+ fThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
0 d1 _ E/ Q/ D4 Eusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-% p4 N. r8 O) R9 x
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
% L6 \+ r {7 z9 `- Zkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test, _+ F* G5 [ H. l
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
5 r# b- L) m Alating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).9 y- [- _0 K) f. A0 m- q( j1 n
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood' M0 @8 ?) X' u$ Q* U7 n) u* r
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were8 s, r) Z& `6 w
within normal range for his age. The concentration7 t; K, R1 h7 F3 |- z8 C! W
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
: S, Q4 F! P% ^8 w5 ?$ ~(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20& w9 Y g2 ?* g: o2 f
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
4 \' F1 N) v( U# _terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),0 y% ], g& ]" W" V
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
( Y& y& F$ `( F0 q6 d0 Z0 g- e49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)# V( o- P- z. d( _ k Q
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
/ N3 g1 t6 M( B L' ztisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total9 J0 v4 V; {7 t3 e1 h3 m- A5 L
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),9 }' _/ D+ U- X2 n
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
' l+ R" q6 r U: ~& }5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular6 s! t: Q3 M; ]- w+ {8 l) U
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone7 a: O P! ~3 a" D
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
/ |5 Y% F+ p$ O1 t(prepubertal).4 o5 C8 N# E0 M2 i3 Z ]; W6 D2 W& Q3 e) e
The parents were notified about the laboratory0 f7 V0 |6 j7 o) Q' t U
results and were informed that all of the tests were
. C4 |# \: a+ nnormal except the testosterone level was high. The5 S% X9 s, u l& |
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to% R) B( X% M) J' L- [- w
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
% R8 d& ?3 H7 Z) {. b/ X( never, the family did not return for 4 months. v7 M; S7 c9 z( j
Physical examination at this time revealed that the1 A0 w, U, s! Y4 R! W( }
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
" P# R% _6 C$ b; j2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
6 ?9 ?: }4 Z1 ounchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
/ Z; Y5 ^/ u( B: \pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
) O9 r& K6 q5 G: B( kthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2
) V% k# d A2 q" S1 E. X) m# K8 LmL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.* N G* y" b4 v9 D. p1 i! i# f
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-3 q, j5 s9 ?* A- p3 G
ing frequent erections.
% m p- M1 P: K/ ^7 r; }8 ABoth parents were again questioned about use of, _' o- _& }0 X5 n: k8 q
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to9 K) F6 V- y4 j
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
9 o5 ~4 p3 P7 Y$ z- S$ f- E- `Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541% W7 ~) N1 n8 [( {+ @# e8 r' o$ E1 m
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
; W& P- A: k5 M! w% e7 }3 ding over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
; L* {& n4 N8 j J4 I, Da year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
% W) c! l& L: w8 t0 W# sto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-4 ^; D L& R- D
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
7 d4 w) i: m: asecondary to depression.
9 _: B0 \# X" ]1 W8 b+ v) H6 DThe child slept in the same bed with parents.! N5 r$ Q* W; d- ~- Y+ P
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his0 H# \+ J7 ^) B# b: G
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-/ f. F1 S) ^ e* @3 P* [
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
& J' v5 Q% G3 V' D1 |5 p, }, UThe father also admitted that after the phone call,# s2 L9 I1 L! X& R6 ^: J0 @
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
3 y9 Z4 U" y0 L( l* rwas high, he then read the product information" u0 R4 |* _; F% i
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-4 I: d: D3 f. }
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
) z- ~9 X) C! [, y* Y. Ldecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the& S" Q/ _! H8 E
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
& F' j+ z# K+ _been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone j. Q( k- i0 Y* Y4 g
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the5 X6 L3 l* T7 [/ [/ ?2 r! v& g
laboratory to obtain the test.
' D- D- T Y+ k* N' K+ QDiscussion
: i! \# \7 Q3 QPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
# U5 L+ ]2 ?. esexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
+ F1 B0 h% G- x/ A" wPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
) X3 }& o* _1 W5 Ait is caused by the premature activation of hypo-8 o4 l- U. q- r' Q, ~9 z
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-) ]5 H1 \" \) g& w' ~/ U: J
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
: z9 v. _0 R, D' n& Dmay have a central nervous system lesion that is& w# X! F3 w5 f8 W9 m6 u
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
& u% k- E e+ x8 ]. Oamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
# w9 n$ a! W( c% wsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
+ J, E8 v: I% o8 O2 c! t* b* o& J$ \boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
6 {$ v. U |2 R, k7 N* @9 }8 Qization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
& c8 Z" ?4 j8 O3 L! A) jrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
1 `4 u/ k' z k) q$ Mgonadotropins.1,32 u7 H% ^2 s3 g' \2 d$ p
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-* M+ D8 b! P- \* O' T/ b
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate2 J' y9 N& U1 H- E, A
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
5 S7 r4 W2 d- o; e1 Nexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-' l+ Y7 I+ r Y" F, M4 l" ^
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
- |/ o1 V8 r9 U9 ~ lcongenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive0 \7 W7 m, f/ y5 g
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
% |$ H6 }& |+ z* [6 Dpuberty in boys.3,4" D9 m. G8 m2 z9 Q1 j+ N9 X
The most common form of congenital adrenal
4 [ c$ S; f& e. }# [hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.4 { j+ n. \) E6 t# f; K
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in, [4 L5 D ~4 M; Q" g9 _1 w" y) t
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
3 C. t- P8 @0 [. ^0 @9 yan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
' T! l( q+ J; U) r. Gexcess.1,3! b) @' c$ |& L# Q! Q! K
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from% Q, |; {* }, b" F* Y# ~
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
& W8 H+ e/ m( r; ~% ?$ H6 j mA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-* d8 a% p- T; N; `- p0 r
independent precocious puberty, which is also known: D O* b6 _- X9 v0 P1 B8 c+ Z3 T
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
6 i2 }+ ]+ B9 N* L0 b" U- N/ A3 Jvery young age. The physical findings in these boys( a# o z7 V6 L% ^, ~( ]% a
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
% H: c! L4 T7 U; Y- w+ ^9 t$ vincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys0 ?- w& }( Z* W
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder4 N; E9 W% O6 }. u% O. t, N
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show, X0 i8 q+ J8 Z3 p4 G
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin- q; L' a- w) E# ?6 @; p% s7 e
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
& X) ?4 ^& |- dautosomal dominant disorder that affects only5 y+ z; f8 v9 }
males; therefore, other male members of the family3 p0 u9 K- S4 E2 x; X+ S* E: O
may have similar precocious puberty.3, p1 B/ q/ o& k: F
In our patient, physical examination was incon-
% X9 \, u* v. Vsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
) w7 ? |4 R, ]2 _3 Y% jcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
* i* F; {+ A; Z! x0 r3 Ywas in the differential diagnosis because his father
! _" j1 T K3 D+ z) q9 M: ?5 ystarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
7 q9 d" o s5 Z6 E/ btesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
# h, H# l/ F2 {) {0 Jbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
& O& L3 k8 Y: M5 N/ G( s, j1 |% Kative initial history of androgen exposure, our
' J2 @* {4 C4 w W& B, bbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,
! k$ J4 y- [2 qeither 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase1 r( T ^; @: S) g
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
1 d3 x( C, V5 p! Ring the normal level of adrenal steroids.! i# f3 y6 b2 P2 j) } N. I
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly' y$ p) }4 ~" H" K$ B
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
8 z+ c `) A' H. W& n5 nthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
+ p |, f. v$ {/ Z' Tpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
4 ?! N) [8 e) y$ N3 \( t: F, Pdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-! ~& f# B+ g( a l3 V
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
6 ~# P! I+ ]2 r/ _4 a: wusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
5 d2 v& w/ }7 r! gDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
6 P; s1 e( j5 w4 H' M8 d, tcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to/ A# v6 w/ d/ _4 N5 `
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.; D. F: A$ l8 G4 ^4 L
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the8 s& J! Z" o2 u* {
baseline value in those females who were exposed to9 W) x E2 W) r3 L, w7 w8 K5 d U
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male1 y# b( V$ K+ K. L
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-7 V2 d E2 T) A) L7 F
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.5 v4 u- s( p J" t W. m8 l
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
4 P6 a/ _# g0 a# \3 Jwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that: B" z# d9 R& d5 H- v1 k: m( ?+ t
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
8 u( j( ^- r4 _terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more( g+ n/ Z- L+ ?# T% `
active in young children exposed to testosterone, m, K0 j) X4 Y9 C, x, c
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
+ W2 n( B" W( ^$ S" ?0 p/ Z& Udrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to7 ~9 j- Q/ Q4 ]. H0 J) `! {8 P% v
virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
/ s7 y* s* [1 B! t1 \children results in an increase in growth velocity and
0 l; R. |2 g0 ?. I. a# {) K; Wadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
+ ~ K& G# f9 M( ?The long-term effect of androgen exposure during* L5 o. T. d( R% x. t
early childhood on pubertal development and final" z: x/ w; g$ B" R, u1 W
adult height are not fully known and always remain5 @ } c& E" R# ?1 v7 g
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
* q" G+ X; n+ X& U s7 o) T4 N. kterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some& Y6 m, I1 X) Q! L" g& l
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
6 f. V, I# Y) ]' a% y! @ wcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation e: ]$ f7 l, d4 n
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
. G/ O) A3 D9 V/ sThere are conflicting reports and controversy, L+ S! Z [0 G+ \' J& I
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult/ S- G7 k: r9 x8 L: z% I6 }
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal1 U- _9 f; i2 ~! |3 a2 r
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
4 n2 ^7 H4 N a% lulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,, ]. p) d& [8 C( V& Q
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
* T: D9 z0 K- x: |3 d9 a I# lchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult/ o+ i/ J% k. g9 G+ C w ]
penile length in clinical studies.0 d4 i) {& x2 B: [9 j
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
( y2 Y" n& D, s; E1 B. Qgoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
7 q3 U6 ^" T8 Ktestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
# C) K1 V" p; H; p& ~' s+ t$ kthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time. e7 D7 a: ]$ B5 S$ _
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
; U+ ?9 D; N9 F6 Bdiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
( w$ S& ], w9 x% N: p# Qthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
& \8 I1 b) [3 I& cheight will not be affected.
& ?. ^! Z2 L/ VAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
0 N& M! k7 ~1 X0 b) Fability of androgen products in our society may! n U; @" ]9 E# Z6 t
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
4 b. k8 T8 Q- j$ V6 K3 b, ?children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-6 q2 V0 k' u8 z/ E) Y, {
gen products must be considered and specific ques-8 Y9 y* q6 {4 j+ l
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or/ U6 |4 A" Y c" r
gel should be asked of the family members during
' |+ I9 l3 h( o5 V0 ~7 \+ w2 D, Qthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-7 s5 \% z/ @, {$ R I
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-
7 B, Z. u: a1 dnosis can be established by just a few tests and by
+ u& q" ~; }6 D% v" ^8 Eappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a2 D2 h$ k' X- Q" a3 x
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may& F# M+ z9 i7 y& L- F. |; T
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive4 v: Y# q, r1 d2 x
investigation. The primary care physician should be& `8 Y9 i; D1 X* {- M9 c. [: B7 m O
aware of this fact, because most of these children
/ T7 ]) @3 O* ?! A0 y' d1 `3 ?2 vmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’4 G0 m: U' @4 R) ?7 [8 P l
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a. d, r6 r2 S* G( u
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or2 ]2 [+ O/ r, Q- u$ {. w" } y
female child who might come in contact with some-9 ?9 ?, {5 j" N! G+ R
one using any of these products.
* b1 g. o' R- E6 Q1 Y$ C. Z; oReferences
2 j# L0 _+ V& k) |6 k$ F" _2 C1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation( \, z% u+ f \% }: _* s2 @) ]$ ]3 z
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
' I8 e6 n) B( e ^Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
9 z, r7 r/ g, k2002: 565-628.
2 q& F$ G; n D& `+ G2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
+ S0 } t7 q" k. Y3 ^5 Ypuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|