- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old* @ |3 K* ?, P% q: H% B0 d( T; a( f
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical2 W* Y, R$ Z7 \9 o9 J+ x
Exposure to Testosterone
% v- L8 P# K# D4 ^/ iSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2& u% x; T. t" s. W, c/ P |
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
% d1 g4 F: H4 z8 Y! l9 EClinical Pediatrics9 T) c% m; h" H/ A
Volume 46 Number 6% M1 l. |$ }+ b# A$ S
July 2007 540-543
- N+ d" E( l% P& X# O© 2007 Sage Publications/ Y& ~6 c5 a2 y, c) Y
10.1177/0009922806296651" T2 q, A) X, p2 X) U: A3 j: a! D0 O
http://clp.sagepub.com/ r8 p" ?' O9 M" W/ q" h
hosted at
$ @, F o* p3 Shttp://online.sagepub.com' }* Y0 U+ e6 a( |
Precocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
* n* L% A7 E( V1 lis a significant concern for physicians. Central
1 o# P& I, @. C: jprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated$ C7 h; t5 v, s J7 c& f2 n
through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has* a& }% O0 K, [6 k$ U
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
, D, z4 L6 D0 }. ^9 P$ R. }! mlesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested4 g6 @8 ?' L# M0 ?- G2 v
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
6 C- C9 X- v' T0 k" Vhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
* v$ k3 d. }: o) c' F0 a) Fcles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
7 u8 ~+ q/ q$ C5 D8 q8 D. G4 _report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
4 L! w# u4 F3 T- h: Nenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
. P6 e: M; R( E6 p' w2 [% f" r3 Oment without testicular enlargement, which was due
1 T# e9 w# Z! Z6 e' ~$ P5 z# B- M- sto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by3 d7 C U% H }. u# c& e8 u! ]
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-
* v. n. h$ A7 ?% {3 r- y# q* t+ `mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
/ j* q8 q1 r+ Tchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of u9 r( V/ ?. ~+ x
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
% \* z2 P8 f, X6 B6 S' xbly more common than the rare case report in the- B5 m) L5 u; B5 n! E: A
literature.4
& k5 g% L h- yPatient Report3 C# \/ D |3 T1 `6 J9 L9 @
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
, o# z9 I) W2 X. ^; N" dendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern6 A; p% X2 f' }: _0 i* B7 V
of early sexual development. His mother noticed4 h1 ?8 h' v6 v! [
light colored pubic hair development when he was
+ e- r! J- h, Y% xFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of( ^/ I% N! y- Z- i/ |
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
2 r- v, Q9 S1 W- I$ Y) c& l9 zAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
! d9 |* f3 g0 s$ b+ I4 |Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
9 u* K) y; ?; i" e; V% ?6 D) O0 Q* hMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
W4 {3 e" }2 m8 K5 `e-mail: [email protected]." e6 @+ g$ r' o, [- |
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became& G- i K1 J* [) W2 g7 X
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-( e Q5 a8 u, Q8 g9 l: A
ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child! m* p$ O$ r* A6 P, A6 b- E, l a
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
& L ~1 W v5 |0 w3 la birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of6 N' b* Z y' R& I8 C8 W$ i1 b
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year7 i8 f6 l7 ~5 M2 ^- L) K
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
3 T `" t. g# T: J. p* Xsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
, \3 \5 E/ ^" j0 j/ ?' Zand his psychosocial and psychomotor development: v. Z/ A! G3 B) U9 g
was age appropriate.& c' W$ Y- S; K
The family history was remarkable for the father,. H* f4 b* _# T q1 h; F% k
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
! F, N( e9 x" dwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s3 k. c% v' k9 W6 n" `- c
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat8 f& r' s8 V& M- |4 C) `
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
% u3 u2 `* ^7 [+ j! TThe father denied taking any other medication. The
8 |$ _) J1 Q1 Y1 ]/ j' ?8 Rchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
# k( F% i+ {4 J) C. p% J+ lwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
) \6 T7 f2 ~- u x; U$ J$ [9 g8 V5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-; X8 n, R1 g( B0 j; p
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
9 R9 I- r( `$ J$ h0 |) P+ ntives. There were no siblings.% ^7 F* O4 ?6 T6 O, Z
Physical Examination+ j3 e4 l" Y/ q* H
The physical examination revealed a very active,, @: s7 d8 J" m+ l3 F: A0 G( y. F9 K
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
q& h' L2 ]3 @a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was) r# y* i) d: Z: n5 E& r3 w2 V8 h
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
1 H# J. O. A S0 S(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth1 S% V( D; k: I6 E6 ^ T
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of+ q+ y, E1 E& ~; m S! u) ^
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.2 Z3 u/ f. |$ {+ K- G
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
$ {! k' G0 w* X* k0 m6 n( Uenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of3 W! _/ L3 A4 ~: C2 p8 d
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
1 o& ?2 G7 z6 c; r6 `) mdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
: s- y, Z6 O k* Z# o1 M540
5 i+ g) P* e- S( O/ \: N5 Hat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from, N- [5 V6 v; Z& ]
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
. d+ Z8 ]4 i' o. k& l! R' xtesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each. x! P7 X+ n3 D5 n( X
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat- r& R- r" @4 b, K) D3 O% |5 p
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no6 r' i& J& Q9 M; |/ X N& ^
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
h1 Y, @( a2 H- ~0 QNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
7 P4 b0 p5 o) c) r3 j: @( ?bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
- b4 {8 v6 {) J+ p1 Eof papilledema.
- J4 F3 {2 q7 u% {4 Y3 @& w2 NLaboratory Evaluation8 E9 q% Z9 n- }' B {- k
The bone age was consistent with 28 months by
e. v7 V; ]' qusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-5 F& n' e" I/ d0 D' P5 v4 S0 m
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal, Y9 N) T) K( N, U
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test" e6 c/ X9 ]2 z7 V( E2 V4 X0 e
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-/ Q+ i' H1 |7 Z/ ~) H
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).7 {# C( K1 Z5 e7 }1 S& ` `
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
& w4 Q! b5 r& D( q2 {urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
% r6 H& n" Q2 }; N2 ?7 c8 Owithin normal range for his age. The concentration5 h+ K- A A& f _5 n& X, W: {
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL/ U, r$ o$ o t! @
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20' W9 F( g0 a2 G1 p; H; a; p
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
+ x9 N4 J( |2 Q8 Bterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),! O$ t( e) Z8 O
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
% F* b `3 U# X) W6 [49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S); W# U/ s4 Q6 y/ w y- L% B
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-/ y' N+ o+ a0 G- d
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total; J/ H! s8 b' x T
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),8 {& \ u5 h( e4 r: F, [" d: z2 Y
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than$ S, H% V3 ~: F- W
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
6 J: S0 A/ s7 Nstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone7 H9 ?. t7 d8 Y* E- \/ I
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL1 o+ j/ M: U) T$ ?6 _9 b& U5 U& F
(prepubertal).: q0 N( ?8 q' a) ~; N8 `7 p; f
The parents were notified about the laboratory3 a8 y" p& V# L: [
results and were informed that all of the tests were
+ S5 \% ~9 ^5 M9 V' [9 Snormal except the testosterone level was high. The2 Z& t& Q9 D: k" I/ P2 x
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
' R4 f0 x# i7 Y; E! P; oobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-) W4 j0 k! e, f% S
ever, the family did not return for 4 months./ B0 @! w1 l# Q1 J
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
8 T t8 `& e5 \9 L) Zchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
* b3 p. u4 p8 q$ o: V( @ S- D" p2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained$ u! \& ` ^# Y, i5 J y# f# E
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
' u5 [3 O8 @2 N* fpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at: I h% R) L; [* |* C z) y" P; ^! S
the base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2/ F7 c" a! U6 {" s0 g: R3 V
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
7 w2 w6 c6 V, |( t( G# C+ G) A0 EThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-1 O/ O! R. l0 ^7 c+ V1 T5 v4 f
ing frequent erections.9 V8 K1 L* [% o9 f) _- Q. S
Both parents were again questioned about use of$ o- b5 m3 g, m+ F2 p
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
. e/ C% V% u$ w1 l) }the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the9 V$ ]& P2 N& b5 g; d, p6 k, V2 r; w$ o
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
7 e' S$ v+ m. r" t2 H8 z4 Cuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
! j) J: j+ \, k) @ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for7 B; q) s% [: K4 ]8 z
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed
: q+ C# S" L1 u6 L/ \1 G, Uto disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
9 v U: \3 z& r( B) g U7 Z- \scribed by his family physician for decreased libido! s! C' H6 b h0 V
secondary to depression.
$ V8 C' s8 u ]; e' HThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
. \8 ]6 z7 ?6 p$ oThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
. ] K9 A3 K. O% n3 v$ i5 nchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-2 P1 t% @0 R* |+ [
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
) g( M+ \. B t. e- s# K! |The father also admitted that after the phone call,$ m8 D8 m: B" x
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby. \) O2 ^$ `/ R' w
was high, he then read the product information2 }5 T# T7 B1 a6 I
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea- H: Z6 {3 F1 f9 ~- Y' D) K9 a
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they& I! }2 q3 \, a# s
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the( B4 T* @9 R @+ F* O
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had- l, C% ^9 Y( N8 J1 h
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
- w$ L6 T0 i& E% V# {2 Htest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
7 a+ } U4 L3 `, y1 t4 X s, S9 ]laboratory to obtain the test.
8 \- }$ O3 A/ r8 H, I" |" I9 VDiscussion
+ M6 B4 L) R( o& X: b- T! FPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
) c& O5 ~) `, M" p: M& Ssexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
0 q$ n0 e9 W& W5 ~3 [2 \1 OPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when, ~$ x2 }/ f: z# Q, ~- Y8 Z
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
+ T' l0 L( \4 D* G1 Nthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-5 l) r- J( d0 M
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
0 x8 R1 W& E) P- w+ a, [may have a central nervous system lesion that is2 G9 Z" s' c" Q1 S" t. B' E
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-6 l" J ~/ X, @: s2 D
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
3 `* T7 w& X/ \; }% {, Vsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
9 K3 Z* m4 D4 O$ v! zboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
$ Z- m% f9 A$ s. o5 vization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
4 e6 P& S9 k3 K/ r5 Y. f; {rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by f* j8 \' D' v4 G( o8 z
gonadotropins.1,3& j3 j5 `! P& e! V% e! L2 s4 ^
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-. ~4 d5 [5 B! L& g" J. l& c' X
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate8 ?, r0 |" h* H/ l& M
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or/ Q! @7 z% E. v0 L6 A
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
4 f, C+ Q- V# {8 ^ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing8 I& v. Z |4 K* j6 i/ E
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
, N. Y0 e5 t5 c) E. \" Padrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
/ z6 c8 P+ d& {) c0 ]puberty in boys.3,49 X6 x4 A2 l$ X1 ^) j
The most common form of congenital adrenal- ~# B8 i; i. A# i
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.5 c( ?# h! u# G( X* M0 q8 K
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in% w5 m8 C! m0 d# N' \+ u7 R
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,* x( h- Z% V6 W% e; E
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
b+ q% x$ j; B6 n h2 k$ Jexcess.1,3, [+ \; y7 N. u
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
) E* R( x: L& Y6 [542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20076 t2 B% H8 E, g
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
6 e$ z5 _7 H, e# v& @9 z; }. j! ~independent precocious puberty, which is also known& G; Z' T$ R( V) E. o0 D/ D
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
, Q9 I9 \8 j4 \$ gvery young age. The physical findings in these boys
& ^/ {: Q; J# l# @ lwith this disorder are full pubertal development,7 s3 t9 u4 o8 Q' V+ n! g
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys% H! u U; b+ x6 U( H" `
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
) O+ M" s/ f6 @; G( ~are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
' v4 A6 r, j# u7 ]6 k/ {) K8 d7 `pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
* {3 n, V% a4 P; f- g4 qreleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
+ A7 z9 ?$ C/ t7 l- K# J- dautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
0 s: Z2 _- m2 Z. i7 T' b! u( x- imales; therefore, other male members of the family- V2 s+ g# p5 Z+ M2 U, ?
may have similar precocious puberty.3
U, t2 H- _/ v( y8 e2 U) WIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
* v- X" p6 T) e' _sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-
8 W/ u! P3 g7 g3 y, F+ G3 L1 ]7 g( Tcles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis. x5 V6 O6 H& O
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
8 H# M& o! D3 Y' Z* `started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
+ u/ S6 V/ V1 Z. I- G% \testicular enlargement is not that evident in the% Z% {, s7 a* _5 A: F/ w1 @$ z
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-1 s. n; j2 }. B- T# [% P% e0 s
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our4 { ]9 I9 O5 H4 b/ ?0 {8 P
biggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,3 n! j; H \2 |/ Z( j
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase
2 Y9 X4 S, N0 Odeficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-' ]% \# @- T" Q2 [
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.7 [8 {1 o7 v; a& S
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
: m* p( t& Z- ?6 l, Wsuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
5 P/ y- a1 I. q- kthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-& ]$ l5 {: @" W% K) b" m: A
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and" B; [4 V6 Y% S. h) q
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
6 s' l( C. ?/ N7 e/ y* u+ [( T4 tterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was! W! K' A% V5 f8 U& R6 z
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’, R+ s" Q4 D7 T
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
. } C# r# `. S+ I! P/ H1 M0 fcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to- @' w* H7 T' A9 r/ N
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.1 i6 d# c1 c" c" u
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
/ x6 a$ R6 a7 l, j; J9 Rbaseline value in those females who were exposed to
/ e3 p4 s) z; l& `even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
- Y- L& R+ s: s, \partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-' e5 d |' O/ d& n4 {; e$ p: C% r
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
( I4 [: f8 m+ ]6 k" zOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
8 K7 `! W6 _; j5 R* i5 ?# Wwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that% b3 ~8 W8 ~# w2 s1 |- W6 N
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
& |. {3 F0 d9 ?terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more" d' q; |3 t- ?- |5 ^
active in young children exposed to testosterone1 |) @, f9 h# L& S% ~
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
4 {% p6 x, K" Rdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
! v% @5 }9 x" C1 |virilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in& z+ l( I& a! U G
children results in an increase in growth velocity and3 y3 i6 C) {1 z% B( Z: ^
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
3 ?# N7 y9 P8 n- NThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during. }' \ ?* R1 X" ]5 w3 D
early childhood on pubertal development and final! Y: u i! z% _
adult height are not fully known and always remain
+ F* G2 d: J2 i7 {, m2 Sa concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
/ E$ G' A% ~' s! }6 \0 ]& J4 Xterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
0 B" J3 r0 s- t. f: ~# k& \' wacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after. Q0 E/ W8 e/ c& p; K" n; Y D1 y5 }) k
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation8 x9 A* v4 v7 u0 t* @
decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
: w7 h" d; z5 ]6 ~There are conflicting reports and controversy( l4 T1 _& s# [# a/ `4 @- Y
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult6 X* T) q9 M7 x- C3 l1 i
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
, ]* ]* b" }) b) ~adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-9 h; ]7 Y f/ y/ w1 m8 c2 Z
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
Y& ?% z9 D8 P: w G3 `+ NSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
! {3 |1 x" Y" k bchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
' N) x+ L& j& K! r8 H, Ppenile length in clinical studies.. M( p" I* b) o- P) @
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
7 e: h( b/ c$ J6 Y- G0 z# }going to experience any of the untoward effects from% c: O2 U$ y y% ^ Q9 A
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
4 L1 |: i: J3 g7 G$ |1 Jthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.! V& v' k2 P" e) b! Q$ m4 ^
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
* [3 m* \7 ~" z% p. odiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at/ G/ u$ [2 Q4 Y. S$ u7 c
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult! ~' E1 U) Z% ]" d/ M: X! S1 k
height will not be affected.
9 d* N( p* r: s: q7 [6 kAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
# @6 i) S: z" c: w$ kability of androgen products in our society may
4 t) _7 `" I0 bindeed cause more virilization in male or female8 m, J) H; w7 U) { r/ D/ N2 T
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
6 @. |" m( q8 I. J- kgen products must be considered and specific ques-
* h# Y6 P7 w- z. b3 M& F. |/ Etioning about the use of a testosterone product or0 T3 f- x# v M5 b2 h" U# G5 D: V
gel should be asked of the family members during
& ?+ ]7 I# g6 v" e5 lthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-1 y) T3 l. F2 @2 X* v
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-/ K' ?% {- y I' A4 R/ j4 O3 e
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
- h8 [ l- i, E7 b$ W' R: D: mappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a- k; m1 H( k: Y: m
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may; L0 L; v+ F) o8 I
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
( `& W) n( w* b0 D, Minvestigation. The primary care physician should be
3 R' }+ a' y: E Daware of this fact, because most of these children
% A( `7 \- V3 ~9 ^; ymay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
, }- O5 T! p. S! ]) w: \9 GDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
( ]; O# Q0 P) ?+ owarning about the virilizing effect on a male or7 C2 @ f. N f! |4 b6 l: g. w3 V5 H
female child who might come in contact with some-
1 t. B1 k" v9 ^ G/ V2 Bone using any of these products.
7 q/ N4 k0 ]% S z( l+ U" DReferences/ ?- O5 m8 @( Z5 U2 P) e
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation: ?* w7 J6 r" p2 Y5 L' j
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric! F& H- }$ X8 o- v: R9 h. C
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;0 }" D0 j& }9 h" l
2002: 565-628.
# C. K9 S/ N9 W2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
9 V* a0 S+ m- |! Opuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|